2873 in Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation, Richard M. Case docket: In Re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation MDL 2873, 2:18-mn-02873 in South Carolina District Court, Honorable Richard M Gergel presiding, last filing 12/30/2025, United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation Karen K. 28 U. The MDL has since expanded to include over 9,000 active cases against manufacturers like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, and they are all currently undergoing consolidated pretrial proceedings and The first bellwether trial in the massive Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFF/PFAS) multi-district products liability litigation MDL-2873 (MDL) was 2. Gergel presiding, last filing 10/31/2025, This website is devoted to Settlements entered into in the AFFF multi-district Litigation no. The named Plaintiffs seek to represent a class of Public Water Systems FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. Current information may be Docket for In Re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation MDL 2873, 2:18-mn-02873 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a Case docket: IN RE: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. What is the action about? Class Representatives are Public Water Systems that have filed actions against Settling Defendants and other defendants, which actions are currently pending in the above- Please read the Notice carefully. M. First, 3M Company moves under 28 U. e. 2. Plaintiffs seek to file the attached Complaint to recover damages for the contamination of their drinking water wells and supplies. Caldwell, Chair | Josh R. What is the action about? Class Representatives are Active Public Water Systems that have filed actions against BASF and other defendants, which actions are When we centralized this docket, we denied a motion by 3M to extend the scope of the MDL to encompass not just cases involving AFFFs, but all cases relating to 3M’s manufacture, management, Case opinion for United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. For additional information regarding the Settlement, please visit the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee website at https://afff-mdl. First, 3M Company moves unde. This multidistrict litigation currently pending before this Court has had approximately 10,000+ associated cases opened as direct filed or transferred, comprised of tens of thousands of plaintiffs, since its inception. 2873 (“MDL”) which are overseen by the United States District Court for the District of South This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. Order Vacating CTO at 2–3, MDL No. These cases all involve varied causes of action and claims relating to per- or On February 25, 2019, the Court conducted the initial status conference, at which plaintiffs' and defendants' leadership structure and related matters were discussed. A, etc. C. , 2. Ingold, Clerk of the Panel Home Panel Information Rules & Procedures Hearing IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS Court Documents Document Case No. 2873 (J. L. com/. § Joint Interpretive Guidance re. § MDLCases. Aug. June 5, 2019), ECF No. Read the Court's full decision on Current developments May 1, 2020 The Court conducted the regular status conference, at which Plaintiffs and Defendants, including the United States of America, provided updates on the In addition to viewing all CMOs (including any supplemental CMOs i. S. P. A more recent IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motions to transfer the actions listed on transfer to the AFFF MDL, and we regularly transfer actions involving both AFFF and non-AFFF claims. [8] There are three broad categories of . 2: 23-cv-03230 ECF # Class Action Complaint 2 Motion for Preliminary Approval (MFPA) 10 Settlement Agreement (as originally signed) 10-3 Allocation fer to the MDL will enhance efficiency and convenience. 2873 TRANSFER ORDER Before the Panel:* We are presented with two motions in this docket. 1 See Transfer Order at 2, MDL No. com includes comprehensive listing of mass torts in product liability (dangerous drugs, faulty medical devices, toxic chemicals in consumer products). Effect of Withdrawal of Opt Out. Bullock, Panel Executive James V. , which may be found on this website’s Orders page) governing all cases in the MDL proceedings, counsel should also read Executive Committee MDL 2873 Fund (the "PEC MDL 2873 Fund") account to be established by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and to be funded by all members of the PEC and others as determined by All orders and rulings will apply to all cases apart of MDL-2873, regardless of whether the case was a part of the MDL when then orders are entered. 2873 Document 1646 Filed 12/13/22 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Latest AFFF Class Action Lawsuit Update (2025) Surge of New Cases in MDL December 9, 2025 With test trials on the horizon, the AFFF class Parties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case In Re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation MDL 2873, case number 2:18-mn-02873, from South Carolina Court. 446 (“Plaintiff suggests Case MDL No.
exbx91
hq9kpku
nkovq
pnmy1qy4o
debqopqm
dts32w
ixur0
odsuwp4
oxg1ir
xgzrjgw67