Tampermonkey Include Vs Match. Could someone enlighten me please? Thanks <3 Is it possible
Could someone enlighten me please? Thanks <3 Is it possible to configure a Tampermonkey script so that it will apply only to the inner pages of a website? For example, I want the script to apply to https://www I have to include all sites in tampermonkey. If no @include is provided, @include * is assumed. If we want our script to run on every webpage, we can use a few different methods. your 说这两个字符非常相似，但@match“对*字符的含义设置了更严格的规则”。然后，GreaseSpot继续使用使用@include，但是像这样的Chrome示例似乎通常使用@match，并 The confusing behavior I observed with Tampermonkey is that @match *://* only matched when the path was empty, which is exactly what it's supposed to do (per the code ). The @match tag tells our For example, if I want my script to be active on google. See these comments for details on the @match syntax. Like the @include tag, you can set more The metadata should include the @name, @match and @description fields, which specify the name of the script and the URL pattern that it should run on. Once you have entered your I need to use a regex to match a URL pattern and I read that @include is the only way to do that. onurlchange. com, what should I put in the @match field? @match rules are preferred over @include, because Chrome will show "This script runs on all domains" when trying to install a Userscript in Chrome. com and youtube. You have to match the path without the hash parameter and make use of window. Could someone enlighten me please? I'll update the documentation to explain this a little bit The @match tag tells our userscript manager which webpage to run on. It is matching every web page I can find except the one I actually need! The GreaseSpot page on metadata blocks says that the two are very similar but @match "sets more strict rules on what the * character means. " GreaseSpot then proceeds to teach using Hello! Even if I try, I do not understand the difference between @include and @match. User scripts specify include and exclude rules in the metadata block. Support for Greasemonkey-style @include patterns is also implemented for compatibility, but @match is preferred. Second @resource, which makes a Getting Started ⬌ Installing Scripts ⬌ Managing Scripts ⬌ Monkey Menu ⬌ Creating Scripts ⬌ Environment ⬌ Other Useful Tools ⬌ API In general user script s should specify at least one 39 Reference: Greasemonkey Include and exclude rules Match Patterns Match patterns and globs The solutions that work on Greasemonkey (which is Firefox), may be @match Let's break the userscript tag down starting with @match: When we create a new script on our desired webpage, TamperMonkey automatically matches it. E. This syntax is also Discussion on @match and @include patterns not matching 「」 mark and text after it in Tampermonkey scripts. With Greasemonkey-style @include rules, it is not possible for Chrome Excludes urls that do not run scripts on these pages, even if the address is included in the @include or @match tag. ) or forward . The script will execute if it matches any include rule, as long as it does not match an exclude rule. this is the script that i have to run // ==UserScript== // @name Phishing Blockz // @namespace http://use. For this reason, @include may also generate Even if I try, I do not understand the difference between @include and @match. The most important difference is that @match is more more rigid and restrictive than @include, and aims to be the more secure alternative. Multiple Settings are allowed. The script will execute if a user script matches any @include, as long as it does not match an @exclude or a global exclude. This syntax is also Basically put the url inside forward slashes ( like /url/ ) to indicate it is regex and before https add a ^ to indicate the beginning of the url. @include doesn't support the URL hash parameter. Represents the JavaScript file @match rules are preferred over @include, because Chrome will show "This script runs on all domains" when trying to install a Userscript in Chrome. However, I get a deprecation message from Tampermonkey when I try to use it and am told to It's correct behavior: @match follows this specs: If you use a wildcard in the host pattern, it must be the first or only character, and it must be followed by a period (. The one I like to use takes Support for Greasemonkey-style @include patterns is also implemented for compatibility, but @match is preferred. The $ Two metadata imperatives allow downloading files (once, at install time) for efficient reference: First @require, which includes a remote code resource. With Sets the page in which the script can be run, allowing multiple tags to be set. I have a deliberately basic userscript which is using "@include *" in the metadata just for the purposes of testing. However, they have some differences in how they Multiple tag instances are allowed. i. . In userscripts, @include and @match are both metadata directives used to specify the URLs of web pages where the userscript should run. @include does not support URL hash arguments.